Featured Post

Dr. Jamie Courter is your Mizzou Beef Genetics Extension Specialist

Image
By Jared E. Decker Many of you have probably noticed that things have been a lot less active on the A Steak in Genomics™   blog, but you probably haven't known why. In January 2021, I was named the Wurdack Chair in Animal Genomics at Mizzou, and I now focus on research, with a little bit of teaching. I no longer have an extension appointment. But, with exciting news, the blog is about to become a lot more active! Jamie Courter began as the new MU Extension state beef genetics specialist in the Division of Animal Sciences on September 1, 2023. I have known Jamie for several years, meeting her at BIF when she was a Masters student. I have been impressed by Jamie in my interactions with her since that time.  Dr. Courter and I have been working closely together the last 6 weeks, and I am excited to work together to serve the beef industry for years to come! Jamie holds a bachelor’s degree in animal science from North Carolina State University and earned a master's degree in animal

Angus Announces Routine Calibration of GE-EPDs

Genomic-enhanced selection tools to undergo scheduled upgrade

American Angus Association® and Angus Genetics Inc. (AGI), the organization’s genetic services subsidiary, will soon release newly calibrated genomic-enhanced expected progeny differences (GE-EPDs).

On March 21, AGI announced plans to release the latest calibration of its genomic-enhanced selection tools in mid-April.

The process is the fifth of its kind since introducing GE-EPDs in 2010, and further refines how DNA test results are incorporated with pedigree, performance measures and progeny data into the selection tools released through the Association’s weekly National Cattle Evaluation (NCE).

AGI President Dan Moser says the extensive process of calibrating GE-EPDs results in further accuracy on more animals in the Association’s growing database, but with generally less incremental change with each consecutive calibration.

“This latest calibration represents a fine-tuning of the genomic-enhanced EPDs provided through AGI,” Moser says. “When this process was first introduced, we had fewer animals with which to train the equations used to generate GE-EPDs. As that process has evolved and we successively gain additional genomic and phenotypic measures, we’re able to refine those equations, allowing for more powerful genetic predictions on more animals.”

AGI and research partner Zoetis began work in June 2015 to train genomic equations using animals within the current population with both DNA information and performance measures like weights and carcass characteristics. Total animals used in the training population numbered more than 108,000 head, a nearly 88% increase from the 57,550 animals used in the last calibration released September 2014 (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Increase in Data over Five Calibrations.

“When GE-EPDs were first developed, they were based on a training population of just more than 2,200 animals, given the novelty of the technology. In comparison, we sometimes process more than that in just one day at AGI,” Moser says. “That’s how quickly we’ve advanced in the past six years. More people than ever are DNA-testing their animals.”

The effort is paying off. Larger test populations provide stronger correlations and explain a greater percentage of genetic variation among traits — but Moser says that percentage jump from one calibration to the next has leveled with time thanks to increasing accuracy with each release.

“For the vast majority of animals, producers won’t notice any significant shifts in GE-EPD values after Calibration 5 is released,” Moser assures. “Heifer pregnancy (HP EPD) may show slightly more change than other traits, and the numbers for young animals with DNA information and little or no progeny, or those with newly incorporated progeny information are perhaps more apt to adjust.” (Table 1.)

Table 1. Genomic Weighting between 2014 and 2016 recalibrations. Expressed as correlations between molecular breeding value (MBV) and phenotypic data.
Trait
Sept 2014
Apr 2016
Difference
CED
0.62
0.67
0.05
BW
0.68
0.69
0.01
WWT
0.56
0.56
0.00
YWT
0.66
0.68
0.02
DMI
0.74
0.73
-0.01
YHT
0.74
0.75
0.01
SC
0.78
0.80
0.02
DOC
0.71
0.68
-0.03
HP
0.45
0.62
0.17
MILK
0.36
0.37
0.01
MWT
0.68
0.74
0.06
MHT
0.68
0.71
0.03
CWT
0.60
0.60
0.00
MARB
0.67
0.65
-0.02
REA
0.69
0.68
-0.01
FAT
0.65
0.65
0.00

In all cases, GE-EPDs will be more accurate than the values they replace thanks to the calibration, a process that normally takes about nine to 10 months. Luckily, computer technology has kept pace with a larger volume of samples, Moser says.

Both phenotypic data and the accuracies built through the calibration process work to better characterize the genetic merit of registered Angus cattle — and set the stage for further advancements in the science of genetic selection.

“We’re continuously looking for ways to streamline the processes involved in providing the industry’s most advanced genomic-enhanced selection tools,” says Moser. “AGI is committed to keeping Angus breeders at the forefront of this technology and ultimately reducing the risks inherent in managing their individual cow herds while also driving efficiency.”

Members may access the complete NCE, released each Friday, at www.angus.org and through the Association’s online record keeping system AAA Login.

ANGUS MEANS BUSINESS. The American Angus Association® is the nation’s largest beef breed organization, serving more than 25,000 members across the United States, Canada and several other countries. It’s home to an extensive breed registry that grows by nearly 300,000 animals each year. The Association also provides programs and services to farmers, ranchers and others who rely on Angus to produce quality genetics for the beef industry and quality beef for consumers.

For more information about Angus cattle and the American Angus Association, visit www.angus.org.

Decker's Take Home Message:
The largest jump in correlation between genomic prediction and phenotype was seen in Heifer Pregnancy (HP). This increase was due to a larger number of heifer pregnancy phenotypic records, thus highlighting the need to report data. Improvements like this are also why the AAA is trying to increase enrollment in MaternalPlus.
On average the correlations increased, with a few traits having slight, basically meaningless decreases.
Recalibration has the benefit of ensuring the genomic prediction matches the current generation. 



Comments

Edward Ortiz said…
This is really a good source of information, I will often follow it to know more information and expand my knowledge, I think everyone should know it, thanks Best Flow meters in UAE service provider

Popular posts from this blog

Show-Me-Select Board Approves Genomic Testing Requirement for Natural Service Sires

New Show-Me-Select Sire EPD Requirements Announced

Bob Hough Comments on Changes at Breed Associations