Featured Post

Hereford and Red Angus Heifers Recruited for Genomics Research

The University of Missouri is recruiting 2,500 Hereford heifers and 2,500 Red Angus heifers to participate in a heifer puberty and fertility genomic research project. Heifers should be registered Hereford, registered Red Angus, or commercial Hereford or Red Angus. Hereford x Red Angus crossbred heifers targeted for the Premium Red Baldy Program would also be a good fit for the research project. Producers must be willing to work with a trained veterinarian to collect the following data: ReproductiveTract Scores collected at a pre-breeding exam 30 to 45 days prior to the start of the breeding season. PelvicMeasurements (height and width) collected at the same pre-breeding exam 30 to 45 days prior to the start of the breeding season. Pregnancy Determination Using Ultrasound reporting fetal age in days. Ultrasound will need to occur no later than 90 days after the start of the breeding season. In addition, heifers must have known birth dates and have weights recorded eithe

Beef Improvement Federation 2016: Decker's thoughts on Dr. Keith Belk's presentation

Dr. Keith Belk spoke at BIF this morning.

Belk suggested we should select based on the microbiome.

Should we be selecting based on the microbiome?

No.

First, our current understanding of the microbiome is very incomplete. Second, the microbiome is not perfectly inherited. Every calf inherits 50% of its DNA from its sire and its dam. DNA can be used for prediction because it is inherited in a predictable manner. The microbiome is not inherited to the same level of predictability. The highest heritibility for a bacterial family is below 40% (DOI: 10.1126/science.aab3958) in human twin studies. In other words, the microbiome is more influenced by the environment, then by inheritance. The microbiome may be a trait that we want to select, but I do not believe it is the tool to make selection decisions.

Swapping genes between symbionts and their hosts are very rare events. Animals have developed mechanisms to stop this from happening. Animals strive to stop other organisms from high jacking their genomes. Are we going to select for horizontal gene transfers? No. We could use gene editing to move genes between species, but the consumer acceptance of this has not been great.

Larger carcasses are one way that we can produce more beef with fewer cows. Dr. Belk seemed to indicate that larger carcasses were bad, without discussing them in the entire context of beef production.

In summary, Dr. Belk veered in some very strange directions that I don't think were constructive for this audience. Perhaps I misunderstood Dr. Belk's comments- if so he is free to respond to my comments.


Dr. Belk did have some worthwhile things to share.

Marbling is important in determining beef palatability. But, tenderness and flavor are also very important to retailers and consumers. And if we have appropriate tenderness, flavor becomes even more important.

"We need to start thinking about selecting for tenderness, juiciness, and flavor," stated Belk.

How much progress have we made in improving meat quality? Part of that improvement is from going from 45% black hide in 2000 to 60% black hide in 2011. In 1995, 49% of carcasses graded choice or better, and in 2011 61% of the cattle graded choice or better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Show-Me-Select Sire EPD Requirements Announced

Show-Me-Select Board Approves Genomic Testing Requirement for Natural Service Sires

Bob Hough Comments on Changes at Breed Associations